Leah Robinson
- Read more about Leah Robinson
- 10 views
Students must know how to observe the opportunities and capacities of human communities, understand where new or existing ideas or systems could bring value within those communities, and be able to act effectively in order to drive sustained and positive change to provide that value.
Validated for university students. Using a computerized tool, participants are asked to inflate a balloon on the computer screen. Each click that inflates the balloon accrues $0.05 in a bank visible on the screen. Participants are free to “collect the money” at any point, until the balloon pops, at which point all money accrued goes back to $0.00 and a new balloon appears. Participants get 10 balloons, and the total amount of money collected is reported at the end.
Validated 7-item instrument for university students. Total number of items = 7; scale from 1(totally agree) to 9 (totally disagree):
Validated 8-item instrument for undergraduate students, using a 5-point scale (Strongly Disagree—Strongly Agree). Sample items include:
Validated 78-item survey for workplace settings, using a 4-point scale (Never—Always). Sample items include:
Score 0-10 given by a reviewer ; 3-level flowchart:
Q1. Is it technically feasible?
(no = 0; yes = Q2)
Q2. Is it technically difficult for the context?
(no = Q3; yes = 4)
Q3. Is it an existing solution?
(no = 7; yes = 10)"
See Figure 2 in link below
Score 0-10 given by a reviewer
0 = Common
2.5 = Somewhat Interesting
5 = Interesting
7.5 = Very Interesting
10 = Innovative
See Table 1 in link below
Validated 18-item instrument for university students, but not yet validated for pretest/posttest outcomes, using a 4-point scale (Disagree—Agree). Sample items include:
Validated 24-item instrument for university students, using a 5-point scale (Disagree—Agree). Sample items include:
Free-writing exercise, self-portrait, and interview; participants asked to describe themselves, the role(s) others play in their lives, and how they acquire knowledge: