Provost's Office Initiative to Promote Disability Scholarship: Request for Proposals

Course Type:
All

Aligned with the University of Michigan’s DEI 2.0 Strategic Plan, the Office of the Provost is soliciting proposals to support the pursuit of new scholarship aimed to better understand and address concerns of faculty and staff on the Ann Arbor campus who have a disability. For this initiative, we embrace a broad definition of disability, which may include mental, physical, and cognitive differences. Proposals are due by 11:59pm ET on October 21, 2024. Awards will be announced in January, 2025.

  • Projects may span descriptive, interventional, or implementation approaches. Community engaged or community-based projects are welcome.
  • Disability scholarship is highly interdisciplinary, therefore we encourage proposals that include multiple disciplines and perspectives, including new and novel collaborations.
  • Applicants must make a compelling case that the project will increase understanding and/or address concerns of faculty and staff on the Ann Arbor campus with disabilities. Projects may include other audiences and communities, but the primary focus of the work should be clearly applicable to these individuals.
  • This program is focused on addressing issues that are pertinent to U-M faculty and staff with disabilities. Projects focused solely on students with disabilities will be considered non-responsive to this program. Projects may include students but must focus on issues pertinent to staff and/or faculty perspectives to be considered fully responsive. We strongly encourage proposals that include staff and faculty as the populations of interest.
  • Examples might include (but are not limited to): single or multi-media explorations of the disability experience on campus, qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods descriptive work, secondary analysis of existing data, intervention development and testing for individuals with disabilities or caregivers, workplace supports, community building, educational and outreach interventions, policy analyses, and adaptation and implementation of established interventions.
  • To share findings more broadly with the community, all funded project teams will be expected to attend and present an update on their work at annual convenings.
  • Applicants are encouraged to confer with and partner with existing groups on campus and when appropriate partner effectively to leverage existing opportunities and data resources.

Eligibility

  • Eligibility for the Catalyst Program: On the Ann Arbor campus, individuals with a primary appointment as Assistant, Associate, or Full Professor (any track), Research Scientists or Investigators, Librarians, Archivists, or Curators are eligible to apply for these awards. Multiple principal investigator (PI) projects are acceptable (and encouraged), but one investigator shall serve as contact PI.
  • Eligibility for the Emerging Scholars in Disabilities Program: On the Ann Arbor campus, the PhD student (in good standing in a Rackham Program) or postdoctoral fellow will be listed as Principal Investigator, with a faculty mentor from the Ann Arbor campus listed as a mentor. Faculty members will provide a signed letter of support that they agree to support the applicant.

Support for Applicants

Funding Levels

  • Catalyst Program: up to $300,000 for 2-3 years. Grant awards up to $300,000 are eligible applicants (see above).
  • Emerging Scholars Program: up to $50,000 for 1-2 years. Grant awards are made to departments for PhD students and postdoctoral fellows. A faculty mentor form is required.

All proposals will undergo merit and budget review. Depending on merit review, proposed grant budgets, and other program expenses, we expect up to ten proposals to be funded.

Funding Period

The period of funding should match the proposed scope of the project. Catalyst program projects are limited to 3 years of support and Emerging Scholars program projects are limited to 2 years of support. The funding period cannot begin until at least January 6, 2025. The project start dates are somewhat flexible, from January 6, 2025 to March 15, 2025.

How to apply for the grant

  • Pre-submission Letter of Intent: All applicants MUST submit a brief letter of intent by 11:59pm ET on October 1, 2024. Click here to submit the letter of intent. You will provide the name of the applicant, the working title, and all key personnel involved in the project.
  • Completed Applications: Include all items listed in the checklist below. Email the complete application packet to [email protected] by 11:59pm ET on October 21, 2024. Name your file LastName_Year.pdf (e.g., Smith_2024.pdf).

Checklist for final applications: Submit the following as a single PDF file in the order listed below

  • Cover Sheet: Use this cover sheet.
    • Include the name of the primary proposal applicant, the title of the project, duration of the project, and level of funding requested.
  • Project Overview (250 words max): Provide an overview of your project with enough detail for a general audience (i.e., outside of your discipline) to read it. This overview will be made public if your proposal is funded.
  • Project Description (Maximum of four 8.5 x 11 single-spaced pages with 0.5” margins, Arial 11 font); references can be on a separate page and do not count toward word limit). Appendices are not allowed. The project description should include:
    • Statement of need/potential impact of the proposed work (up to 0.5 page)
    • Proposed work plan (up to 1-1.5 pages)
    • Dissemination and communications plan (up to 0.5 page). For the dissemination and communications plan, outline how the project results will be shared with the University of Michigan community and other relevant communities. Specify potential venues and opportunities to disseminate project findings. Clearly outline how you will make the plan accessible to the community (i.e., accessible documents, use of alternate text, transcripts, and subtitles)
    • On the final page of the project description, summarize the qualifications of the project team. This does count toward the four-page limit.
    • Note: Emerging Scholars awards require a letter of support from the applicant’s faculty mentor. See below for details.
    • For projects involving human subjects research, applicants must obtain appropriate IRB approval. Project leaders are responsible for assuring all project data are protected in accordance with university policy.
  • Budget Request & Justification: Use this budget worksheet.
    • Provide the total amount requested and a budget breakdown.
    • Provide a clear and brief explanation for all proposed expenditures and how each will help to achieve the project goals.
    • See additional information about eligible expenses and justification in the budget worksheet. Department and university spending policies must be followed for all projects.

Additional Documentation for Emerging Scholars

  • For the Emerging Scholars proposals, faculty members must agree to serve as a mentor to the PhD student or Postdoctoral fellow applicants. Faculty members should complete a Faculty Mentor Agreement form (which requires the proposal title and name of the primary applicant) and their attestation that they agree to support the proposal. This must be completed by the application deadline of October 21, 2024, at 11:59pm ET.
    • Forward to your faculty member the Faculty Mentor support form along with a complete copy of your application packet, including budget. The faculty member should review the proposal, and then forward the signed Faculty Mentor Agreement form to [email protected]. These must be received by the submission deadline.

Proposal Review Criteria and Evaluation Process

All applications will be reviewed by an interdisciplinary panel of advocates and experts in disabilities outside of the University of Michigan. Successful proposals should be accessible to a broad, interdisciplinary audience of reviewers.

Each proposal will be evaluated by a set of four overarching criteria:

  1. Applicant makes a convincing case that the topic is relevant for University of Michigan faculty and staff on the Ann Arbor campus with disabilities.
  2. Potential for new knowledge gained that will advance goals of equity and inclusion on our campus.
  3. Diversity of disciplines and perspectives included in the proposal.
  4. Potential for the dissemination and communications plan to accelerate effective implementation. The plan addresses pertinent accessibility concerns.

Reporting Requirements

We require all funded grant recipients to disseminate their results by completing a brief web form within three months of the project’s completion. These reports will be publicly displayed at a later date.

Questions?

Please review our Frequently Asked Questions and carefully read the guidance above. Contact [email protected] if you have questions or issues submitting your proposal.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you define disability for this Initiative?

We recognize there are multiple definitions and conceptualizations of disability and wish to embrace an inclusive view. This initiative extends beyond the ADA definition to include, but not be limited to examining concerns of individuals who live with a physical, mental, or cognitive condition. This also includes individuals who are neurodivergent. The applicants are encouraged to clearly define the individuals of interest for the project and make a compelling case for scholarship in the selected area.

Are staff eligible to apply as applicants?

Both the catalyst and emerging scholars programs have specific eligibility requirements for the roles who can apply as the primary applicant. We strongly encourage project teams to include U-M staff members as consultants and co-creators of the proposals and subsequent projects.

Can projects be based on the Dearborn or Flint campuses?

Due to the funding parameters, applicants must have their primary appointment on the Ann Arbor campus. Projects that emphasize the needs of Ann Arbor faculty and staff are strongly encouraged. However, projects are welcome to include consultants and/or communities from the Dearborn and Flint campuses as either consultants or as participants in project activities.

Why can’t staff and/or lecturers serve as the PI for the Catalyst program?

The program parameters are focused on research led by individuals in the roles described in the call for proposals. That said, research teams are encouraged to include staff in varying capacities, depending on the nature of the project and research topics may focus on staff-related concerns.

Must our project include U-M Ann Arbor faculty and staff as participants?

To be maximally responsive, we strongly encourage an explicit focus on U-M Ann Arbor faculty and staff. However, projects that can be directly applied to these communities, and/or include other key groups, are acceptable. This should be well-justified in the proposal.

My project won’t take the full amount of time.

Projects need not take the full period of time allotted. (3 years in the case of the Catalyst program and 2 years in the case of the Emerging Scholars Program). Each project team in their budget justification will outline how they will achieve the project goals in the appropriate time period. No project can exceed the times allotted, however.

May I submit multiple proposals?

Primary applicants may only submit one proposal for consideration. However, they may serve as consultants and collaborators (or faculty mentors) on other proposals. The review process will consider equitable distribution of funds across highly-meritorious projects.

As a faculty member with a disability, I very much support this initiative, but I’m wondering why it isn’t paired with funding for disabled faculty to do their research

While this initiative is aimed primarily to better understand and characterize the experiences and challenges of faculty and staff on the Ann Arbor campus with a disability, faculty members who have a disability are welcome to apply. Please review the eligibility criteria on the website.

How does the Provost’s Office recommend we identify faculty with disabilities or neurodivergence? Does university have a database or community in mind?

Although we can help you connect with self-identified communities of interest, it is not possible to make available a database of U-M faculty and staff with disabilities. If you are interested in collecting data from individuals with disabilities, there may be alternate ways to make that connection, bearing in mind that your approach must be consistent with IRB and university requirements.

Is there a sense of how many faculty/staff with disability/neurodivergence there are or where we could find that info? Or is that itself a potential project question?

Estimates vary notably. This library guide may be of assistance. The State of Michigan estimates 2.3 million (out of 10 million) residents have a disability. The U-M 2021 climate surveys, conducted under the auspices of the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, provide estimates based on survey respondents.

If the team receives multiple proposals that are very similar, will they be able to help us connect or will one just be rejected? Similarly, will there be an opportunity to match individuals with similar interests?

Although we understand the concern, the Provost’s Office cannot directly connect researchers who propose similar projects nor can we match individuals with similar interests. The Office of the Provost is exploring the possibility of hosting an unmoderated zoom meeting, and a shared google document where individuals can express interests or post queries (completely voluntary and optional).

Andy Brosius, Research Coordinator at the Center for Disability Health and Wellness, issued the following open invitation for interested individuals:

Is the Emerging Scholars program only for PhD students enrolled at U-M? Not U-M staff or faculty who are also PhD students at other schools (since U-M doesn't have a disability studies program)?

Yes, that is correct. The Emerging Scholars program targets PhD students in good standing in a U-M Ann Arbor Rackham program or postdoctoral fellows who hold a primary appointment on the Ann Arbor campus.

Does it matter what year doctoral students are in or is it just that they should be in good standing?

There are no particular requirements regarding the year of study students are in, but reviewers will want assurances that the student has the bandwidth and the ability to carry out the proposed scholarship.This should be explained when describing team qualifications, a required component of the proposal

Does the faculty mentor on the application need to be one with a disability?

No, neither the faculty mentor nor the doctoral student are required to have a disability. Rather, the focus of the scholarship should be on disability as per the call for proposals.

My question isn’t answered here or in the guidance on the website.

Please email us at [email protected] as soon as possible so we may respond while you prepare your proposal.
 


Source URL: https://crlt.umich.edu/provosts-office-initiative-promote-disability-scholarship-request-proposals