Gilbert Whitaker Fund for the Improvement of Teaching
Gilbert Whitaker Fund for the Improvement of Teaching
- 4544 views
Request for Proposals
CRLT is soliciting proposals for Gilbert Whitaker Fund grants to support faculty in pursuing innovative projects that enhance teaching and learning at the University of Michigan. Proposals are due by 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 14, 2025. Awards will be announced in April, 2025.
While we welcome proposals across the range of innovations in teaching and learning, we encourage proposals that focus on the following types of activities:
- innovations in teaching methods or approaches (i.e., approaches new to a specific course, to the department, to the discipline)
- evidence-based best practices for enhancing student learning
- departmental curriculum redesign/enhancement (beyond a single course)
- application of equity-focused teaching frameworks, including anti-racist pedagogy
- faculty and/or GSI professional development activities around teaching
- assessment of courses or curricula
Eligibility
The competition is open, on the Ann Arbor campus of the University, to all tenured and tenure-track faculty; clinical instructional faculty; lecturers who have continuing appointments and course development responsibilities (i.e., an assignment from the dean, chair, or designee to develop a new course or significantly revise an existing course). For collaborative proposals, the primary project director listed on the Application Cover Sheet must meet eligibility requirements. Applicants who received Faculty Development Fund grants in the past may seek support for new proposals. If a choice must be made between projects of equal merit, priority will be given to the proposal submitted by an applicant who has not received funds during the previous academic year.
Support for Applicants
Schedule a Consultation: We strongly recommend that prospective grant applicants schedule a consultation with CRLT to clarify likely funding categories, project design, and budgeting for CRLT services (e.g., evaluation/assessment support, retreat/workshop facilitation, extensive consultations). Please contact CRLT at (734) 764-0505 or [email protected], if you have questions or want to schedule a consultation. Appointments during the last week of the submission period are very limited.
Attend a Pre-proposal Information Session: Register for the Developing a CRLT Teaching and Learning Grant Application on Thursday, December 5, 2024 from 1:00 - 2:30 pm.
Previously Funded Projects: Learn more about previous successful projects by clicking “View Funded Projects” and “View Final Reports” at the top of this page.
Funding Levels
Level 1: up to $10,000
Grant awards up to $10,000 are available to individual faculty members or small groups of faculty proposing innovative revisions to courses or innovative course development or initiating smaller innovative projects to improve teaching and learning at the University of Michigan. Successful proposals provide evidence of how these projects go above and beyond standard course design or course revision.
Level 2: up to $17,500
Grant awards up to $17,500 are available to departments, programs, and groups of faculty who want to work together on more extensive teaching and learning projects that require a larger investment of time/resources and broader collaboration than Level 1 proposals. Examples of the types of proposals that could be supported through Level 2 funding include: departmental curriculum development, review, and evaluation; integration of experiential learning or research experiences for undergraduates; consideration of departmental teaching evaluation and review practices; development of robust support and resources for graduate student instructors.
Funding Period
The period of funding will vary according to the requirements of the project, but is limited to two years. The funding period cannot begin until May 1, 2025. Projects must be completed by April 30, 2027.
All grant funds must be spent by April 30, 2027. Grantees are responsible for working with their departmental budget managers to ensure grant funding is spent within the project timeline and in accordance with the UM policies and procedures. All unspent funds should be returned to the Office of the Provost upon project completion.
Application Process and Submission Procedure
All applications are submitted electronically online and should follow the format shown in the Proposal Template below. All proposals must be submitted by 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 14, 2025.
To apply, download the Whitaker proposal template below. Once you’ve completed your proposal, please save it as a single PDF file using the following naming convention: LastName_GrantType_Year.pdf (e.g., Smith_Whitaker_2025.pdf).
Download Whitaker Proposal Template
Chair Evaluation(s) (submitted via email)
- Send your complete proposal along with the Chair Evaluation Form to your home/primary department chair.
- If co-applicants from multiple departments are involved, include chair evaluation forms from all relevant department chairs.
- The chairperson(s) should evaluate the proposal, and then forward the Chair Evaluation Form to [email protected]. These must be received by the submission deadline.
To submit a proposal:
- Click the Submit Application button at the top of this page.
- Fill out the web form (to preview the form, click the Submit Application button).
- Upload your complete proposal as a single PDF file using the following naming convention: LastName_GrantType_Year.pdf (e.g., Smith_Whitaker_2025.pdf).
Proposal Checklist
Applicants should prepare a proposal, using the Whitaker proposal template, that includes the following items:
- Cover Sheet: Provide information about the proposal applicant(s) and the proposed project.
- Project Overview: (250 words max): Provide an overview/abstract of your project with enough detail for a general audience (i.e., outside of your discipline) to read it. You will also submit this electronically on the application webform. This overview will be made public on the CRLT website if your proposal is funded.
- Project Description: The project description should be concise, clear, well–organized, and no more than 1,500 words, including any information provided via links. References can be on a separate page and do not count toward the word limit. The project description should include the following 5 sections:
- Background and Rationale: Provide a brief narrative that contextualizes the proposed project and provides sufficient background (e.g., current literature, current practices & resources, existing student or course data) for a reader who may not be familiar with the author’s discipline or interdisciplinary perspective.
- Goals & Activities: Provide a detailed description of the goals, objectives, and activities of the project. Provide a description of the anticipated timeline for completing the project activities. If more than one applicant is involved, please articulate who will be responsible for completing each activity on the timeline.
- Impact on Student Learning: Describe your project’s anticipated impacts on student learning, including the number of students who will be affected and the specific nature of the impact on student learning (e.g., supports equity-focused teaching; increases student retention or persistence, sense of belonging, learning or engagement, etc.). Discuss the project’s potential for broader impacts on the curriculum and/or discipline.
- Evaluation Plan: Provide a description of how the success/impact of this project will be evaluated and documented. You might describe, for example, what data you plan to collect, who will collect it, when you will collect it, who will analyze the data, etc. Approaches might include, but are not limited to: midterm course assessments; assignment, syllabi or other course document reviews; analysis of student work; end-of-term student ratings; focus group; surveys; etc. (CRLT staff would be glad to consult with you on approaches to evaluation.)
- Communication Plan: Provide a description of how the findings or results of the project will be shared within the department, program, university, and beyond the university.
- Budget Request & Justification:
- Provide the total amount requested and a budget breakdown.
- Provide a clear and brief explanation for all proposed expenditures and how each will help to achieve the project goals.
- Please do not include CRLT services (e.g., evaluation/assessment support, retreat/workshop facilitation, extensive consultations) in your proposal without a prior consultation with a CRLT representative.
- See additional information about eligible expenses and justification in the budget information section of the proposal template.
- Letter(s) of Support: (As needed, but strongly recommended for Level 2 proposals)
- Evidence of sufficient institutional support (e.g., a letter from supervisor, chair, dean, etc.) and of primary applicants and co-applicants with prior experience with similar projects or ability to undertake the project (e.g., through academic preparation or prior/current work experience)
- Chair Evaluation Form(s):
- Send your complete proposal along with the Chair Evaluation Form to your home/primary department chair.
- If co-applicants from multiple departments are involved, include chair evaluation forms from all relevant department chairs.
- The chairperson(s) should evaluate the proposal, and then forward the Chair Evaluation Form to [email protected]. These must be received by the submission deadline.
Proposal Review Criteria and Evaluation Process
All Gilbert Whitaker Fund proposals are reviewed and ranked by the appropriate dean and then undergo a review process carried out by members of the CRLT Faculty Advisory Board, which is made up of faculty from a wide range of disciplines (humanities, arts, STEM, social sciences, health sciences). The final funding decisions will be made by the Office of the Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs. Successful proposals should be accessible to a broad, interdisciplinary audience of faculty colleagues.
Each proposal will be evaluated by a set of four overarching criteria:
- Importance of Project: The proposal explains the specific project to be implemented, clearly delineating the need for the project and how the project represents an improvement upon, or important departure, from existing practice, and it goes above and beyond standard elements of course development or course revision. The proposal addresses how the project would lead to significant and sustainable change in the teaching and learning environment at U-M, and it aligns with departmental, college, or University educational priorities.
- Project Design: Explicit objectives to be achieved during the project are clearly described and aligned with the purpose of the project. The implementation plan includes all major activities. Evaluation is clearly articulated and aligns with the project objectives and activities. There is a clear plan for disseminating results with colleagues in the department or U-M more broadly.
- Probability of Project Completion: The applicants and participants in the grant are able to carry out the project activities, and the responsibilities of each member of the project team are described. Institutional resources, structures, and related factors are in place to support the proposed project. Proposed timeline (up to 2 years) is sufficient to achieve the project’s objectives.
- Budget and Justification: All costs are listed, and each is justified with an explanation of why it is necessary and how the budgeted amounts were estimated. All expenses are within the guidelines for grant expenditures, including the level of funding. A plan for ownership and use of any equipment purchased with grant monies after the grant period ends is clearly described.
Reporting Requirements
All recipients are required to submit a brief webform summary of the grant activities within three months of the project’s completion. Click here to download the Final Project Report Guidelines. These reports will be publicly displayed on the CRLT Grants Reporting website so that others can learn about your project, its impact, and lessons learned.
Questions?
Please contact CRLT at (734) 764-0505 or [email protected] if you have questions or issues submitting your proposal to the CRLT website.
Gilbert Whitaker Fund Recipients, Winter 2024
- Katherine Davis, Middle East Studies, LSA
- A Culture of Hieroglyphs: Developing a Visual Approach to Complex Ancient Writing
- Glenn Fox and B. Kathleen Alsup, Medical School
- Extending Anatomical Reality
- Alton Johnson, Medical School
- Mi-VISION: Michigan Virtual Immersion Surgical Interactive Operation Navigation
- Emmanuelle Marquis, Materials Science and Engineering
- Design of two MSE technical courses within a social justice framework
- Rogerio Pinto, Social Work
- Skin Deep Art Installation: Developing Critical Consciousness to Abate Colorism
- Andrew Noverr and Carla Iglesias Garrido, Romance Languages and Literatures, LSA
- Uniform Spanish 232: Creating materials to enhance student learning and alleviate their financial burden
- Kimberly Smith, John Benedict, Jeremy Moghtader, Michaela Zint, and Kim Diver, SEAS; Selena Smith, Earth and Environmental Sciences, LSA; Noah Webster, Institute for Social Research; Joseph Trumpey, Art & Design
- Increasing Access to Experiential Learning
- Jeanne Stuckey, Janet Smith, Raymond Trievel, Uhn-Soo Cho, Nicole Koropatkin, Tomasz Cierpicki, and Zhaohui Xu, Medical School; Emily Scott, Pharmacy; Jayakrishnan Nandakumar and Randy Stockbridge, Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, LSA; Jennifer Bridwell-Rabb and Markos Koutmos, Chemistry, LSA
- Development of a graduate level on-demand course in X-ray crystallography
- Stephen Ward, Afroamerican and African Studies, LSA; Craig Regester and Rose Gorman, Residential College, LSA
- Building SiD [Semester in Detroit] 2.0: A Detroit Community Process