Anatomy in the Third Reich: victims and perpetrators

Anatomy in the Third Reich: victims and perpetrators

Academic Year:
2011 - 2012 (June 1, 2011 through May 31, 2012)
Funding Requested:
$1,940.00
Project Dates:
-
Applicant(s):
Overview of the Project:
Application for Lecturers' Professional Development Grant: Travel grant for work on "Anatomy in the Third Reich: victims and perpetrators"Applicant: Sabine Hildebrandt MD; Division of Anatomical Sciences Dep. of Medical Education; University of Michigan Medical School1. Description of the professional development activityShort description of planned activity: Since 2008 I have been teaching seminars for medical students on the history and ethics of anatomy and have found the students to be very responsive to this topic. My hypothesis is that we can draw conclusions for ethical behavior in modern anatomy from the study of the history of anatomy. To this end I have explored several aspects of the history of anatomy, with an emphasis on anatomy in the Third Reich (Hildebrandt 2006, 2008, 2010, 2011). Research on this aspect of medicine in the Third Reich has become increasingly active in recent years, but much more work still needs to be done. While my studies first focused on a preliminary overview of the existing literature (Hildebrandt 2009a,b,c), I have recently had the opportunity to start work at the Federal Archives as well as at the State-Library in Berlin, Germany. There I discovered the existence of historical documents pertaining to victims and perpetrators in the field of anatomy that have not yet been thoroughly explored. My intent is to return to Berlin and study these documents and other archival material.Anatomy in the Third Reich: Sixty years after the end of the Third Reich, the National Socialist (NS) regime in Germany, a comprehensive history of anatomy during this time period is still unwritten (Aumüller and Grundmann, 2002). Several studies on the topic have documented the involvement of anatomists in policies that are questionable from a modern ethical point of view, such as the use of the bodies of NS victims for anatomical dissection. A closer analysis of the anatomy in the Third Reich may help anatomists develop ethical guidelines for modern anatomy (Winkelmann and Schagen, 2009). The bioethicist Arthur Caplan (Caplan, 1994) recommends a very careful look at the details of this history as a foundation for analogies between the practices of then and now; an analysis which may lead to "instructive application" (Cahill, 1994) in modern anatomy, a discipline now considered a vehicle for teaching medical ethics (Dyer and Thorndike, 2000; Goddard, 2003). Over the last three decades, studies of individual anatomists and anatomical institutions have been published in increasing numbers. Many German universities have evaluated their NS past, one of the earliest ones being the analysis of the University of Tübingen by Adam in 1977. These evaluations often include analyses of their medical departments (Bonn: Forsbach, 2006; Giessen: Oehler-Klein, 2007; Göttingen: Beushausen et al., 1998; Hamburg: Rothmaler, 1990; Heidelberg: Eckart et al., 2006; Jena: Zimmermann, 2000; Hossfeld et al. 2003, Redies et al., 2005; Marburg: Aumüller et al., 2001; Aumüller and Grundmann, 2002; Tübingen: Mörike, 1988; Schönhagen, 1992; Drews, 1992; Vienna: Malina and Spann, 1999). These studies revealed insights into the politics of faculty and institutions, relevant laws, the interaction between government and universities and the sources of bodies for dissection (which frequently were victims of National-Socialist policies). There is also information about the involvement of related sciences such as anthropology and racial hygiene (eugenics). Still lacking are more in-depth studies of perpetrators and victims. These victims include not only those NS victims who were dissected in anatomical departments, but also the anatomists, whose careers were disrupted by NS-policies. A first analysis of the breadth of the subject matter can by no means show a complete picture of anatomy in the Third Reich, but it serves as a foundation for further work. The aim of a closer examination of this history is not to denounce, but to elucidate the facts in order to learn from history, to realize our own potential fallibility and to find guidelines for the future (Mitscherlich and Mielke, 1947; Kater, 1987, p56). "We may not be able to judge [the NS anatomists], but we can and must set desirable standards of consciousness and behavior and aspire to live up to them" (Cohen and Werner, 2009). [all literature references can be found in Hildebrandt 2009, a,b,c]2. Discussion of how receipt of a Lecturers' Professional Development grant will further the lecturer's scholarship and teachingI believe that ongoing serious scholarship is essential for a university teacher to be effective (Hildebrandt, 2010). My students have responded very positively to the results of my scholarly work on the history of anatomy in the Third Reich. A new path in this work has led me this year to archives in Germany, particularly the Berlin archives. I expect to gain new insights into the history of victims and perpetrators in the field of anatomy from 1933 to 1945 by studying contemporary documents at the federal archives and e.g. information held at the "Gedenkstätte Plötzensee", the memorial center for the victims of executions at the Plötzensee prison. I intend to integrate the new information gained in my ongoing seminars for second year medical students as well as in presentations for a wider audience within the framework of our Anatomical Research Seminar Series.3. Itemized budget:This grant application asks for travel expenses only ("travel required to access resources of other institutions")Typical roundtrip airfare from Detroit to Frankfurt/Germany in May or June with Delta is $ 1312 in May to $ 1772 in June. Typical train roundtrip from Frankfurt to Berlin: 116 Euros (1 Euro ~ $1.45)Total: $ 1,940.204. Curriculum vitae Sabine Hildebrandt MD1977-1984: Medical training in Marburg, Germany and London, UK1984: Licensed as Physician (Germany)1985: Passed the Foreign Medical Graduates Examination in the Medical Sciences (FMGEMS) 1985-1990: Postdoctoral work, Marburg, Germany, and Connecticut, US1997-2002: Lecturer in Medical Sciences, Germanysince 2002: Lecturer, Division of Anatomical Sciences, UMMSsince 2008: M2 (second year medical students) elective seminars on the history and ethics of anatomical dissection and the history of anatomy in the Third ReichRelevant Publications:Hildebrandt S. Letter to the Editor. First Symposium on "Anatomie im Nationalsozialismus" (Anatomy in national socialism), Würzburg Germany, September 29, 2010. Clinical Anatomy 24:97-100 (2011)Hildebrandt S. Lessons to be Learned from the History of Anatomical Teaching in the United States of America: The Example of the University of Michigan. Anat Sci Edu 3:202-212 (2010)Hildebrandt S. Anatomy in the Third Reich: An Outline, Part 1. National Socialist Politics, Anatomical Institutions, and Anatomists. Clinical Anatomy 22:883-893 (2009)Hildebrandt S. Anatomy in the Third Reich: An Outline, Part 2. Bodies for Anatomy and Related Medical Disciplines. Clinical Anatomy 22:894-905 (2009)Hildebrandt S. Anatomy in the Third Reich: An Outline, Part 3. The Science and Ethics of Anatomy in National Socialist Germany and Postwar Consequences. Clinical Anatomy 22:906-915 (2009)Hildebrandt S. Capital Punishment and Anatomy: History and Ethics of an Ongoing Association. Clinical Anatomy 21:5-14 (2008)Hildebrandt S. How the Pernkopf Controversy Facilitated a Historical and Ethical Analysis of the Anatomical Sciences in Austria and Germany: A Recommendation for the Continued Use of the Pernkopf Atlas. Clinical Anatomy 19:91-100 (2006)
Final Report Fields
Project Objectives:
Since 2008 I have been teaching seminars for medical students on the history and ethics of anatomy and have found the students to be very responsive to this topic. My hypothesis is that we can draw conclusions for ethical behavior in modern anatomy from the study of the history of anatomy. To this end I have explored several aspects of the history of anatomy, with an emphasis on anatomy in the Third Reich, National Socialism (NS; Hildebrandt 2006, 2008, 2010, 2011). Research on this aspect of medicine in the Third Reich has become increasingly active in recent years, but much more work still needs to be done. While my studies first focused on a preliminary overview of the existing literature (Hildebrandt 2009a,b,c), I have lately had the opportunity to start work at the Federal Archives as well as at the State-Library in Berlin, Germany. There I was able to access the originals of historical documents pertaining to victims (specifically a list of names of women whose bodies were used by the Berlin anatomist Hermann Stieve for his research, a list mentioned in the literature) and perpetrators in the field of anatomy that have not yet been thoroughly explored. My intent was to return to Berlin and study additional documents and other archival material with the help of funds made available through the Lecturers’ Professional Development Grant. I expected to gain new insights into the history of victims and perpetrators in the field of anatomy from 1933 to 1945 by studying contemporary documents at the federal archives and e.g. information held at the “Gedenkstätte Plötzensee”, the memorial center for the victims of executions at the Plötzensee prison
Project Achievements:
2. Report of how Lecturers’ Professional Development grant did further the lecturer’s scholarship and teachingActivities made possible by grant:a. archival research at the “Gedenkstätte Deutscher Widerstand” in Berlin, Germany, from 5/7-5/11/2012 b. participation in a workshop “Aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse zur Geschichte der Anatomie im Nationalsozialismus” (“Recent research results on the history of anatomy in National Socialism”) in Halle, organized by Prof. Dr. Florian Steger, Chair, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Universität Halle, 5/10/2012c. visit to the “Meckel’sche Sammlung”, historical anatomical collection at the Institute of Anatomy, University of Halle, personal guided tour by collection director Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Schultka and historian Michael Viebig, 5/10/2012d. acquisition of copies of personnel files of Prof. Dr. Robert Herrlinger, anatomist and medical historian, from the archives of the university of Würzburge. visit for discussions on “Stieve’s list” with Dr. Andreas Winkelmann, coordinator of anatomical education at the Institute of Anatomy, Charité Hospital Berlin, 5/9/2012Ad a. The victims on Stieve’s list had been executed at Plötzensee prison. After contacting the director of the “Gedenkstätte Plötzensee”, Prof. Dr. JohannesTuchel, I was informed by him that all relevant documentation on the persons executed at the Plötzensee during the time of National Socialism was held at the “Gedenkstätte Deutscher Widerstand” (memorial site for the German opposition) in the Bendlerblock on Stauffenbergstrasse, Berlin. From 5/7/2012 to 5/11/2012 Prof. Tuchel and his colleague Andreas Herbst helped me with accessing all materials available concerning “Stieve’s victims” at the Gedenkstätte. I was able to collect biographical data on a more than 170 of the 182 persons named on Stieve’s list. I will use these data in a collective portrait of the women (and very few men) on the list and compare them with other groups of NS victims known to have been used for anatomical dissection. This material will be sought to be published in either “Clinical Anatomy” or “Annals of Anatomy”, who both have a track record of publishing my historical articles (a copy of the planned paper will be submitted in due time to the grant organization). The new information will also be included in my next seminar for M2 medical students on the “History of Anatomy in Third Reich” in October 2012.Ad b. Workshop Halle. My German colleagues were kind enough to coordinate the timing of a workshop on new results in the history of anatomy in the Third Reich with my visit to Berlin. In Halle I presented the results of my latest project “Research on bodies of the executed in German anatomy: An accepted method that changed during the Third Reich. Study of anatomical journals from 1924 to 1951” in German (meanwhile published online, Hildebrandt 2012). At the same time I was able to learn about new projects investigating the history of individual anatomical departments during the Third Reich (Munich, Cologne, Kiel, Würzburg) and discuss results with various colleagues. The audience for this workshop was larger than expected, about 80 persons, including chairmen of anatomy and medical history from Halle and Munich, medical and other historians and medical students. Again, information gained from this workshop will be included in my upcoming seminars.Ad c. On the occasion of my visit to Halle Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Schultka, director of the “Meckel’sche Sammlungen” at the University of Halle, invited me to a personal guided tour of this world-famous historical anatomical collection. Also present at the tour was Michael Viebig, historian and director of the memorial site “Roter Ochse”, the Halle execution site during the Third Reich. Both colleagues gave me an unforgettable insight into the history of Halle anatomy and the anatomical treasures housed in this unique collection. Knowledge gained from this visit will inform my second seminar for M2 students on the “History and Ethics of Anatomical Dissection”, next planned for October 2012.Ad d. I had planned on visiting the university archives of the university of Würzburg on my trip to Germany in order to look for information on the anatomist and medical historian Prof. Dr. Robert Herrlinger. Herrlinger had worked with bodies of the executed during the Third Reich and had supposedly been the topic of postwar discussions of this type of work. However, no exact information on this discussion was available until now, which is why I wanted to find documents on Herrlinger. Communication with Dr. Marcus Holtz, director of the university archives of the university of Würzburg, revealed that I did not have to personally appear there. He searched for and found the personnel files on Herrlinger, and I was able to purchase copies of these documents. These papers have recently arrived and reveal an exciting new insight into an as yet undocumented German postwar controversy on the use of bodies of the executed for anatomical dissection. I am currently in the process of preparing a manuscript for publication in “Annals of Anatomy” (a copy of the planned paper will be provided to the grant organization in due time). The results of this research will also inform my M2 seminars.Ad e. During my stay in Berlin I was able to visit my colleague Dr. Andreas Winkelmann at the institute for anatomy at the Charité HospitaBerlin. Dr. Winkelmann is an expert on the life of Hermann Stieve and has collected information on the women on Stieve’s list. We were able to compare notes and he shared additional information on these persons with me. In consequence I was able to obtain a more complete set of information on these victims.I intend to integrate the new information gained in my ongoing seminars for second year medical students as well as in presentations for a wider audience within the framework of our Anatomical Research Seminar Series.Itemized budget:This grant application asked for travel expenses only (“travel required to access resources of other institutions”)- Roundtrip airfare from Detroit to Frankfurt/Germany, Delta, 5/2-5/13/2012: $ 1290.10- Train ticket Giessen-Berlin 5/5/2012: Euro 63.00 ($ 83.37)- Train ticket Berlin Halle roundtrip 5/10/2012: Euro 98.00 ($129.67)- Train ticket Berlin Marburg 5/11/2012: Euro 105.00($138.94)- Fees for copies from University archive Würzburg 4/5/2012 (listed under travel fess because they actually replaced the need for personal travel to Würzburg: Euro 197.40 (+ $30 cable fee: $306.36)Sum total: $ 1,948.44(Application had been for a total of: $ 1,940.20) The project has resulted in the publication of 3 papers: Hildebrandt S. The women on Stieve’s list: Victims of National Socialism whose bodies were used for anatomical research. Clinical Anatomy, 26:3-21 (2013) Hildebrandt S. The case of Robert Herrlinger: A unique postwar controversy on the ethics of the anatomical use of bodies of the executed during National Socialism. Annals of Anatomy, (2012) published online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2012.07.006 Hildebrandt S. Research on bodies of the executed in German anatomy: An accepted method that changed during the Third Reich. Study of anatomical journals from 1924 to 1951, Clinical Anatomy, (2012) published online: DOI 10.1002/ca.22107
Continuation:
I will continue evaluating the data and publishing the results as decribed above. My upcoming M2 seminars in October 2012 will be modified accordingly.
Dissemination:
I will present my latest results within a seminar of our Anatomical Research Seminar Series at the Division of Anatomical Sciences UMMS in fall 2012. In addition I am planning, as decribed above, on the publication of at least two papers resulting from the information gained through the means of this grant.
Advice to your Colleagues:
The support of this project by the Department of Medical Education UMMS was essential. Also, it was important for this particular travel grant to have all contacts and necessary travel well organized before the travel activity. Thus I was able to use my time in Berlin optimally and could refrain from an unnecessary journey to Wuerzburg.