Developing an Integrated Approach to Teaching Legal Writing to Upper-Level Law Students

Developing an Integrated Approach to Teaching Legal Writing to Upper-Level Law Students

Academic Year:
2012 - 2013 (June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013)
Funding Requested:
$10,000.00
Project Dates:
-
Applicant(s):
Overview of the Project:
This project is an attempt to improve the teaching of legal writing to upper-level law students. The project involved a new clinic for appellate advocacy, offered in the fall of 2013. The course was scheduled to launch under a single clinical professor, and the grant funds were used to add a second professor from the legal practice program. The two professors co-taught the class. This type of collaboration has never occurred at the law school. The project had three specific goals: 1) to create a new learning experience for students utilizing the skills of professors from two distinct departments; 2) to improve the teaching in the clinical law program by learning new techniques on how to teach legal writing to upper level students and 3) to improve the teaching in the legal practice program by providing legal practice professors evidence of how students research and write in the context of actual case work which will inform future developments of the first year legal research and writing curriculum.
Final Report Fields
Project Objectives:

As explained above, the objectives of the course were to offer a new learning opportunity for (1) students; (2) clinical law professors; and (3) legal practice professors, and to improve the methods for teaching legal writing in the clinical and legal practice programs.

Project Achievements:

The course is only one month old, and yet we already feel that we have made great strides in our methods and strategies for teaching legal writing. We have developed new exercises for discussing how to write a better statement of facts, a sharper legal argument, clearer questions presented, and a more persuasive introduction. We have developed a greater appreciation for the value of one-on-one conferences, and a much better sense for how to spend that conference time efficiently. We have received a good deal of positive feedback and comments from the students, and we have already begun speaking with our colleagues about some of the lessons we have learned (although we have plans to do much more of this once the semester has come to an end).

Continuation:
The course itself will end in December (at the end of the grant period). Our plans for dissemination, as described below, will extend beyond the grant period into next spring.
Dissemination:
Within our clinical program and legal practice program, we will be reporting our activities and conclusions at “rounds” sessions, probably in early 2013. We have also proposed presentations at the following conferences: (1) AALS Conference on Clinical Legal Education (Chicago, April 2013); (2) Social Justice Collaborations Workshop (Philadelphia, June 2013); and (3) Legal Writing Institute Biannual Meeting (Philadelphia, June 2013).
Advice to your Colleagues:
We found it very valuable to have frequent, regular meetings between ourselves, the collaborators, starting several months before the course began. We found that this allowed us to not only develop ideas and exercises to use in the course, but to share thoughts and approaches that made it much easier to teach together in the actual classes.